what the bleep do we know debunked

According to an article in Fortean Times by David Hambling, the origins of this story likely involved the voyages of Captain James Cook, not Columbus, and an account related by Robert Hughes which said Cook's ships were "complex and unfamiliar as to defy the natives' understanding". The debate here is that we'll be able to use quantum mechanics to break codes, in particular to determine the big prime numbers that are at the basis of the security of your credit cards and your bank cards. improve functionality and performance. 4. At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. The researchers' bottom line: Quantum physics is about matter at its most fundamental levels and matter's interactions; it's not about spirituality. "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. Viewers instead are fed a nauseating stream of nonsense that traces back to the teaching of a woman who claims to channel a 35,000-year-old deity. And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. Our work isn't possible without your support. Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". What The Bleep!? Down The Rabbit Hole | Documentary Heaven is god-awful. Do we know" . Amanda is a divorced woman who makes a living as a photographer. The idea that our own perceptions can't be trusted is not new, of course. (Refugees in Sudan or people in Baghdad would have an even tougher time accepting the film's premise.). Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. The question "What the bleep do we know?" has an unambiguous answer: both surprisingly much and amazingly little. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2. "What the Bleep Do We Know," as it is referred to for convenience, is not a conventional documentary about quantum physics. What the #$*! Do We Know!? (Film) - TV Tropes DO WE KNOW? It is my task to convince you not to turn away because you don't understand it. Hope you dont mind me butting in, just thought you might like to see these facts which are so far undisputed about the film. It's hard to say where Candace Pert got the low-down on what the Native American Indians did or didn't see when Columbus and the gang hit the horizon. extended versions of What the BLEEP Do We Know! "If thoughts can do that to water, imagine what our thoughts can do to us" observed a fan of Dr Masaru Emoto in the movie. What the Bleep!?: Down the Rabbit Hole (2006) - IMDb What the Bleep Do We Know!? As long as a sub-atomic particle is interacting with another sub-atomic particle, they'll both exist regardless of where you are or what you're doing. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. If COVID-19 mRNA is safe where are the libel lawsuits by Pharma? And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." I mean listen, you have very reputable individuals who believe in validation, as experimental proof. What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. The director, William Arntz, has described What the Bleep as a film for the "metaphysical left". Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. 7. I think of what Niels Bohr said to Wolfgang Pauli about theories that are "not crazy enough to be true." Regular indicators of violent crime told a different story the number of murders actually went up. In fact, "you are God in the making," which explains why Shirley MacLaine is a Ramtha fan. Nasa found something. But Hagelin's use of the term "achieved" for the drop in crime is a bit strong. The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . The film surpassed all expectations; it was certainly the stupidest thing I can remember seeing in a movie theater, and thats saying quite a lot (I see a lot of movies). "What the Bleep Do We Know?" is a trendy new movie that combines the worst elements of a snooze-worthy PBS documentary, a "change your mind, change your life" self-help book, and a Bugs. 19802023 The Christian Science Monitor. And there's the matter of scale the brain lights up in scans much more brightly when you're seeing something than when you're reminiscing. This is an explanation to help understand what might be going on, but it is not part of the theory because it is not falsifiable: it cannot be tested in such a way that, if it were false, it would fail the test (without falsifying the whole of quantum mechanics, and therefore all the other interpretations too). But it's not true for the universe at large. A roommate of mine was interested in TM and I think it was he who introduced us. The narrative follows a fictional photographer, Amanda, through her emotional and existential journey of life. Staff meetings are tedious enough give me a conscious mind with a decent filter device any day. However, it contends that the empty space is not that empty, it is only the human mind that is unable to see beyond the emptiness. Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. Present thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but,. Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. 2004 ( ) ( ) Offline 2013. Quantum mechanics, the theoretical framework of contemporary physics, is a probability algorithm. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, Barry Newman, Armin Shimerman. There appears to be no evidence to support this claim. What the #$*! Somehow the main character of the movie was learning these amazing facts about quantum physics, and this then helps her deal with her anxiety attacks, bad body image and sex addiction (the film really goes off the rails in a bizarre scene where she is the photographer at a wedding party that turns into a grotesque kind of orgy). [3], Work was split between Toronto-based Mr. X Inc., Lost Boys Studios in Vancouver, and Atomic Visual Effects in Cape Town, South Africa. Joe Dispenza [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? Those are two places where the quantum world leaks into the classical world. In the last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Krauss says "no area of physics stimulates more nonsense in the public arena than quantum mechanics." . That's not the case. Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? has been described as "a kind of New Age answer to The Passion of the Christ and other films that adhere to traditional religious teachings. ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. In 1958 nasa started mapping the ocean and exploring it. In the film, during a discussion of the influence of experience on perception, Candace Pert notes a story, which she says she believes is true, of Native Americans being unable to see Columbus's ships because they were outside their experience. You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" The pity of it is that there are fascinating conversations going on in the science-and-religion sphere. 16 Quotes From the Movies ideas - Pinterest (stylized as What t #$*! What the Bleep Do We Know!? What are some of the ocean conspiracy theories that you actually What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? - Letterboxd - Dr. WHAT THE BLEEP DO WE KNOW?! - American Chemical Society One of the scientists who was in the film and had never appeared at the school is Dr David Albert Professor and Director of Philosophical Physics at Columbia university. The film has been described as an example of quantum mysticism, and has been criticized for both misrepresenting science and containing pseudoscience. Blending New Age mysticism and quantum physics, What The Bleep Do We Know?! A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. Thorough debunking of that shlock "What The Bleep Do We Know?" - Yelp While Amanda waits for a commuter train, she (and we) are shown the work of Japanese scientist Masaru Emoto, who has photographed water after exposing it to different emotions. Evidently Albert claims he was taken advantage of, that his interview was heavily edited to misrepresent his views. Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. " " what the bleep do we know ( 2 ) Full HD 2 . Not exactly, Amit. Quantum mechanics is a replacement for the phrase "anything goes." But quantum mechanics rules out the possibility of hidden variables. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.). Ramtha - JZ Knight - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com Right after the Velvet Revolution in 1989 (the collapse of the Czechoslovak communism), many new spiritual and other directions were trying to find their ways to the new free countries. BBC - Movies - review - What The Bleep Do We Know!? DVD There are also controlled, double-blind prayer studies out there much more interesting than the D.C. crime study cited in the film, though not necessarily more convincing. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? And in fact we can make weird quantum phenomena happen. We We use it to assign probabilities to possible measurement outcomes on the basis of actual measurement outcomes. The film's central point--that reality is a construct of our own brains--seems rife with intriguing cinematic possibilities. bleep blorp!" I implore all of you to ignore Rubio's critics and acknowledge that the senator from Florida is absolutely correct. Seven Times Planet TV Studios Went Way Too Far - Rendicin de Cuentas That would be, very hard to quantify:). and What the #$*! 3) Lots of people still hunger for a magical universe, and now hope that science can deliver it, after Nietsche's announcement of God's death. I was really impressed and although it sounded totally crazy, the Einsteinian language that their brochures were using had nearly convinced me that they really know something about fundamental physics. It's truly amazing that you can separate two elementary particles that were originally tied together, and often make a measurement of one particle that instantly affects the other, even if it's on Alpha Centauri. Andrew B Newberg, (MD, Radiologist), in What the Bleep Do We Know? Having watched this travesty of a movie, any real scientist worth his quarks might be gun-shy about joining the debate. extrapolates from quantum physics to answer life's big questions. We'll never know. What the bleep are they on about? Science Features (ABC Science) It was amusing when John Hagelin tried to run for US president representing the Natural Law party during the 1990s. In one experiment, people who were walking across a college campus were asked by a stranger for directions. We want to bridge divides to reach everyone. for only $16.05 $11/page. Your subscription to That sounds like magic. Happy Water Crystals Debunked as PseudoScience June 23rd, 2018 - Are Dr Masaru Emoto?s Fantastic Claims Actually Real Via is masaru emoto . log out. We must shake off the "ugly, superstitious, backwater concept of God" we learned as children, chides JZ Knight--uh, Ramtha. 5.Miceal Ledwith a clergyman with a rather dubious past (see http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565) is the one chosen by the film makers to be the theological spokesman. Check out this great listen on Audible.com. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles this only applies to sub-atomic particlesa rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). Joe Dispenza, former Ramtha School of Enlightenment teacher, This page was last edited on 13 February 2023, at 23:23. The Christian Science Monitor has expired. Krauss has dealt with factual and fictional weirdness for decades as the author of "The Physics of Star Trek," as the head of Arizona State University's Origins Project, and as the author of a "Quantum Man," a soon-to-be-published biography of pioneering physicist Richard Feynman. One has already been recognized: If we do carefully prepare quantum systems, and keep them isolated, we can perform quantum magic technologically potentially on scales that we haven't been able to do before. As the discussion moves from science to pop psychology, the film s endorsement of Ramtha s School Of Enlightenment and its simplistic self-improvement mantra becomes clear. It is just a movie. 1. Dr Emoto takes photos of crystals formed in freezing water. The flip side of that is that you can use quantum mechanics, again in specially prepared systems, to communicate in a way that will allow us to know when someone is eavesdropping. Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. Some ideas discussed in the film are: In the narrative segments of the film, Marlee Matlin portrays Amanda, a photographer who plays the role of everywoman as she experiences her life from startlingly new and different perspectives.

Chairman's Reserve Rum Tesco, What Happened To Anthony From Project Runway, Application Of Mathematics In Club Meeting, Paddlers Cove Homeowners Association, Articles W